Review



igf1r crispr activation plasmid  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Santa Cruz Biotechnology is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Santa Cruz Biotechnology igf1r crispr activation plasmid
    Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex-mediated stimulation on <t>INSR/IGF1R</t> and ERK1/2. HEK293 cells were pretreated with dimethyl sulfoxide (linsitinib [−]) or with linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) and subsequently stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, Pas2r12–IgG, or insulin for 2 min ( A – C ) or 10 min ( D – F ). Panels A and D show representative Western blot images. Panels B and E display the phosphorylation levels of INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R); panels C and F show the phosphorylation levels of ERK1/2 (pERK1/2); all values were normalized to GAPDH. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed and compared with the solvent control (DMEM only, linsitinib [−]) using Student’s t -test. For each treatment condition, linsitinib (+) was compared with the corresponding linsitinib (−) condition. Statistically significant differences compared with the control are indicated on the bar graphs; significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Statistical comparisons were performed against control cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. N = 4.
    Igf1r Crispr Activation Plasmid, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/igf1r+crispr+activation+plasmid/IGF-IR+CRISPR+Activation+Plasmid/pmc12736253-230-11-16
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    igf1r crispr activation plasmid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide"

    Article Title: Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide

    Journal: Pharmaceuticals

    doi: 10.3390/ph18121885

    Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex-mediated stimulation on INSR/IGF1R and ERK1/2. HEK293 cells were pretreated with dimethyl sulfoxide (linsitinib [−]) or with linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) and subsequently stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, Pas2r12–IgG, or insulin for 2 min ( A – C ) or 10 min ( D – F ). Panels A and D show representative Western blot images. Panels B and E display the phosphorylation levels of INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R); panels C and F show the phosphorylation levels of ERK1/2 (pERK1/2); all values were normalized to GAPDH. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed and compared with the solvent control (DMEM only, linsitinib [−]) using Student’s t -test. For each treatment condition, linsitinib (+) was compared with the corresponding linsitinib (−) condition. Statistically significant differences compared with the control are indicated on the bar graphs; significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Statistical comparisons were performed against control cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. N = 4.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex-mediated stimulation on INSR/IGF1R and ERK1/2. HEK293 cells were pretreated with dimethyl sulfoxide (linsitinib [−]) or with linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) and subsequently stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, Pas2r12–IgG, or insulin for 2 min ( A – C ) or 10 min ( D – F ). Panels A and D show representative Western blot images. Panels B and E display the phosphorylation levels of INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R); panels C and F show the phosphorylation levels of ERK1/2 (pERK1/2); all values were normalized to GAPDH. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed and compared with the solvent control (DMEM only, linsitinib [−]) using Student’s t -test. For each treatment condition, linsitinib (+) was compared with the corresponding linsitinib (−) condition. Statistically significant differences compared with the control are indicated on the bar graphs; significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Statistical comparisons were performed against control cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. N = 4.

    Techniques Used: Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics, Solvent, Control

    Effect of IGF1R and INSR knockdown on the Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP. Western blot analyses ( A – C ) and confocal laser scanning microscopy images ( D , E ). Graphs B and C show IGF1R and INSR expression levels, respectively, normalized to GAPDH. Cells analyzed with confocal laser scanning microscopy in panel A were analyzed by Western blot ( A – C ). ( D ) Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP in knockdown cells, with EGFP fluorescence shown in green, and ( E ) percentage of cells exhibiting cytosolic EGFP delivery. Scale bars represent 20 μm. Statistical comparisons were performed against siNC cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 4.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of IGF1R and INSR knockdown on the Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP. Western blot analyses ( A – C ) and confocal laser scanning microscopy images ( D , E ). Graphs B and C show IGF1R and INSR expression levels, respectively, normalized to GAPDH. Cells analyzed with confocal laser scanning microscopy in panel A were analyzed by Western blot ( A – C ). ( D ) Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP in knockdown cells, with EGFP fluorescence shown in green, and ( E ) percentage of cells exhibiting cytosolic EGFP delivery. Scale bars represent 20 μm. Statistical comparisons were performed against siNC cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 4.

    Techniques Used: Knockdown, Western Blot, Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy, Expressing, Fluorescence

    Assessment of IGF1R overexpression. ( A ) Verification of IGF1R expression levels in HEKI cells. ( B ) Relative levels of IGF1R expression normalized to GAPDH based on the data in panel A. Values for IGF1R/GAPDH are expressed compared with parental HEK293 cells (set to 1). Statistical comparisons were performed against HEK293 cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 3. ( C ) Subcellular localization of IGF1R is shown in green; nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bars represent 20 μm.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Assessment of IGF1R overexpression. ( A ) Verification of IGF1R expression levels in HEKI cells. ( B ) Relative levels of IGF1R expression normalized to GAPDH based on the data in panel A. Values for IGF1R/GAPDH are expressed compared with parental HEK293 cells (set to 1). Statistical comparisons were performed against HEK293 cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 3. ( C ) Subcellular localization of IGF1R is shown in green; nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bars represent 20 μm.

    Techniques Used: Over Expression, Expressing

    Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex stimulation on INSR/IGF1R in IGF1R-overexpressing cells. ( A ) HEKI#66 cells pretreated with DMSO (linsitinib [−]) or linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) were stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, or insulin for 2 min. Level of phosphorylated INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R) was assessed by Western blot. ( B ) Relative levels of pINSR/pIGF1R, normalized to GAPDH, corresponding to the data in panel A. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed using Student’s t -test. Each treatment condition was compared with the solvent-treated HEKI#66 control (linsitinib [−]), and, for each treatment, phosphorylation levels in the linsitinib (−) and linsitinib (+) conditions were also compared. Statistically significant differences compared with the solvent-treated control are indicated on the bar graphs, and significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 3.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex stimulation on INSR/IGF1R in IGF1R-overexpressing cells. ( A ) HEKI#66 cells pretreated with DMSO (linsitinib [−]) or linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) were stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, or insulin for 2 min. Level of phosphorylated INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R) was assessed by Western blot. ( B ) Relative levels of pINSR/pIGF1R, normalized to GAPDH, corresponding to the data in panel A. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed using Student’s t -test. Each treatment condition was compared with the solvent-treated HEKI#66 control (linsitinib [−]), and, for each treatment, phosphorylation levels in the linsitinib (−) and linsitinib (+) conditions were also compared. Statistically significant differences compared with the solvent-treated control are indicated on the bar graphs, and significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 3.

    Techniques Used: Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics, Solvent, Control

    Effect of IGF1R overexpression on the Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP. ( A ) Representative confocal images showing the cellular uptake of Pas2r12–EGFP in IGF1R-overexpressing (HEKI) cells. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( B ) Relative levels of the cytosolic delivery efficiency of EGFP in HEKI cells compared with parental HEK293 cells (set to 100%). Merged images show EGFP fluorescence (green) and differential interference contrast. Statistical comparisons were performed against HEK293 cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). ** p < 0.01. N = 3.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of IGF1R overexpression on the Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP. ( A ) Representative confocal images showing the cellular uptake of Pas2r12–EGFP in IGF1R-overexpressing (HEKI) cells. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( B ) Relative levels of the cytosolic delivery efficiency of EGFP in HEKI cells compared with parental HEK293 cells (set to 100%). Merged images show EGFP fluorescence (green) and differential interference contrast. Statistical comparisons were performed against HEK293 cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). ** p < 0.01. N = 3.

    Techniques Used: Over Expression, Fluorescence

    Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex stimulation on INSR/IGF1R in INSR-overexpressing cells. ( A ) IN#1 cells pretreated with DMSO (linsitinib [−]) or linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) were stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, or insulin for 2 min. Phosphorylation of INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R) was assessed by Western blot. ( B ) Relative levels of pINSR/pIGF1R were normalized to GAPDH, corresponding to the data in panel A. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed using Student’s t -test. Each treatment condition was compared with the solvent-treated IN#1 control (linsitinib [−]), and for each treatment, phosphorylation levels in the linsitinib (−) and linsitinib (+) conditions were also compared. Statistically significant differences compared with the solvent-treated control are indicated on the bar graphs, and significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. N = 3.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex stimulation on INSR/IGF1R in INSR-overexpressing cells. ( A ) IN#1 cells pretreated with DMSO (linsitinib [−]) or linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) were stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, or insulin for 2 min. Phosphorylation of INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R) was assessed by Western blot. ( B ) Relative levels of pINSR/pIGF1R were normalized to GAPDH, corresponding to the data in panel A. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed using Student’s t -test. Each treatment condition was compared with the solvent-treated IN#1 control (linsitinib [−]), and for each treatment, phosphorylation levels in the linsitinib (−) and linsitinib (+) conditions were also compared. Statistically significant differences compared with the solvent-treated control are indicated on the bar graphs, and significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. N = 3.

    Techniques Used: Phospho-proteomics, Western Blot, Solvent, Control

    Related Articles

    Transfection:

    Article Title: Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide
    Article Snippet: .. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 with 5 μg of the IGF1R CRISPR Activation Plasmid (sc-400084-ACT; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). ..

    CRISPR:

    Article Title: Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide
    Article Snippet: .. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 with 5 μg of the IGF1R CRISPR Activation Plasmid (sc-400084-ACT; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). ..

    Activation Assay:

    Article Title: Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide
    Article Snippet: .. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 with 5 μg of the IGF1R CRISPR Activation Plasmid (sc-400084-ACT; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). ..

    Plasmid Preparation:

    Article Title: Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide
    Article Snippet: .. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 with 5 μg of the IGF1R CRISPR Activation Plasmid (sc-400084-ACT; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). ..



    Similar Products

    93
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology igf1r crispr activation plasmid
    Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex-mediated stimulation on <t>INSR/IGF1R</t> and ERK1/2. HEK293 cells were pretreated with dimethyl sulfoxide (linsitinib [−]) or with linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) and subsequently stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, Pas2r12–IgG, or insulin for 2 min ( A – C ) or 10 min ( D – F ). Panels A and D show representative Western blot images. Panels B and E display the phosphorylation levels of INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R); panels C and F show the phosphorylation levels of ERK1/2 (pERK1/2); all values were normalized to GAPDH. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed and compared with the solvent control (DMEM only, linsitinib [−]) using Student’s t -test. For each treatment condition, linsitinib (+) was compared with the corresponding linsitinib (−) condition. Statistically significant differences compared with the control are indicated on the bar graphs; significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Statistical comparisons were performed against control cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. N = 4.
    Igf1r Crispr Activation Plasmid, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/igf1r+crispr+activation+plasmid/IGF-IR+CRISPR+Activation+Plasmid/pmc12736253-230-11-16
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    igf1r crispr activation plasmid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-11
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex-mediated stimulation on INSR/IGF1R and ERK1/2. HEK293 cells were pretreated with dimethyl sulfoxide (linsitinib [−]) or with linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) and subsequently stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, Pas2r12–IgG, or insulin for 2 min ( A – C ) or 10 min ( D – F ). Panels A and D show representative Western blot images. Panels B and E display the phosphorylation levels of INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R); panels C and F show the phosphorylation levels of ERK1/2 (pERK1/2); all values were normalized to GAPDH. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed and compared with the solvent control (DMEM only, linsitinib [−]) using Student’s t -test. For each treatment condition, linsitinib (+) was compared with the corresponding linsitinib (−) condition. Statistically significant differences compared with the control are indicated on the bar graphs; significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Statistical comparisons were performed against control cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. N = 4.

    Journal: Pharmaceuticals

    Article Title: Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide

    doi: 10.3390/ph18121885

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex-mediated stimulation on INSR/IGF1R and ERK1/2. HEK293 cells were pretreated with dimethyl sulfoxide (linsitinib [−]) or with linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) and subsequently stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, Pas2r12–IgG, or insulin for 2 min ( A – C ) or 10 min ( D – F ). Panels A and D show representative Western blot images. Panels B and E display the phosphorylation levels of INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R); panels C and F show the phosphorylation levels of ERK1/2 (pERK1/2); all values were normalized to GAPDH. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed and compared with the solvent control (DMEM only, linsitinib [−]) using Student’s t -test. For each treatment condition, linsitinib (+) was compared with the corresponding linsitinib (−) condition. Statistically significant differences compared with the control are indicated on the bar graphs; significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Statistical comparisons were performed against control cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. N = 4.

    Article Snippet: Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 with 5 μg of the IGF1R CRISPR Activation Plasmid (sc-400084-ACT; Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics, Solvent, Control

    Effect of IGF1R and INSR knockdown on the Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP. Western blot analyses ( A – C ) and confocal laser scanning microscopy images ( D , E ). Graphs B and C show IGF1R and INSR expression levels, respectively, normalized to GAPDH. Cells analyzed with confocal laser scanning microscopy in panel A were analyzed by Western blot ( A – C ). ( D ) Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP in knockdown cells, with EGFP fluorescence shown in green, and ( E ) percentage of cells exhibiting cytosolic EGFP delivery. Scale bars represent 20 μm. Statistical comparisons were performed against siNC cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 4.

    Journal: Pharmaceuticals

    Article Title: Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide

    doi: 10.3390/ph18121885

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of IGF1R and INSR knockdown on the Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP. Western blot analyses ( A – C ) and confocal laser scanning microscopy images ( D , E ). Graphs B and C show IGF1R and INSR expression levels, respectively, normalized to GAPDH. Cells analyzed with confocal laser scanning microscopy in panel A were analyzed by Western blot ( A – C ). ( D ) Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP in knockdown cells, with EGFP fluorescence shown in green, and ( E ) percentage of cells exhibiting cytosolic EGFP delivery. Scale bars represent 20 μm. Statistical comparisons were performed against siNC cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 4.

    Article Snippet: Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 with 5 μg of the IGF1R CRISPR Activation Plasmid (sc-400084-ACT; Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

    Techniques: Knockdown, Western Blot, Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy, Expressing, Fluorescence

    Assessment of IGF1R overexpression. ( A ) Verification of IGF1R expression levels in HEKI cells. ( B ) Relative levels of IGF1R expression normalized to GAPDH based on the data in panel A. Values for IGF1R/GAPDH are expressed compared with parental HEK293 cells (set to 1). Statistical comparisons were performed against HEK293 cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 3. ( C ) Subcellular localization of IGF1R is shown in green; nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bars represent 20 μm.

    Journal: Pharmaceuticals

    Article Title: Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide

    doi: 10.3390/ph18121885

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Assessment of IGF1R overexpression. ( A ) Verification of IGF1R expression levels in HEKI cells. ( B ) Relative levels of IGF1R expression normalized to GAPDH based on the data in panel A. Values for IGF1R/GAPDH are expressed compared with parental HEK293 cells (set to 1). Statistical comparisons were performed against HEK293 cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 3. ( C ) Subcellular localization of IGF1R is shown in green; nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bars represent 20 μm.

    Article Snippet: Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 with 5 μg of the IGF1R CRISPR Activation Plasmid (sc-400084-ACT; Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

    Techniques: Over Expression, Expressing

    Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex stimulation on INSR/IGF1R in IGF1R-overexpressing cells. ( A ) HEKI#66 cells pretreated with DMSO (linsitinib [−]) or linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) were stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, or insulin for 2 min. Level of phosphorylated INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R) was assessed by Western blot. ( B ) Relative levels of pINSR/pIGF1R, normalized to GAPDH, corresponding to the data in panel A. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed using Student’s t -test. Each treatment condition was compared with the solvent-treated HEKI#66 control (linsitinib [−]), and, for each treatment, phosphorylation levels in the linsitinib (−) and linsitinib (+) conditions were also compared. Statistically significant differences compared with the solvent-treated control are indicated on the bar graphs, and significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 3.

    Journal: Pharmaceuticals

    Article Title: Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide

    doi: 10.3390/ph18121885

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex stimulation on INSR/IGF1R in IGF1R-overexpressing cells. ( A ) HEKI#66 cells pretreated with DMSO (linsitinib [−]) or linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) were stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, or insulin for 2 min. Level of phosphorylated INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R) was assessed by Western blot. ( B ) Relative levels of pINSR/pIGF1R, normalized to GAPDH, corresponding to the data in panel A. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed using Student’s t -test. Each treatment condition was compared with the solvent-treated HEKI#66 control (linsitinib [−]), and, for each treatment, phosphorylation levels in the linsitinib (−) and linsitinib (+) conditions were also compared. Statistically significant differences compared with the solvent-treated control are indicated on the bar graphs, and significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. N = 3.

    Article Snippet: Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 with 5 μg of the IGF1R CRISPR Activation Plasmid (sc-400084-ACT; Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

    Techniques: Western Blot, Phospho-proteomics, Solvent, Control

    Effect of IGF1R overexpression on the Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP. ( A ) Representative confocal images showing the cellular uptake of Pas2r12–EGFP in IGF1R-overexpressing (HEKI) cells. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( B ) Relative levels of the cytosolic delivery efficiency of EGFP in HEKI cells compared with parental HEK293 cells (set to 100%). Merged images show EGFP fluorescence (green) and differential interference contrast. Statistical comparisons were performed against HEK293 cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). ** p < 0.01. N = 3.

    Journal: Pharmaceuticals

    Article Title: Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide

    doi: 10.3390/ph18121885

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effect of IGF1R overexpression on the Pas2r12-mediated cytosolic delivery of EGFP. ( A ) Representative confocal images showing the cellular uptake of Pas2r12–EGFP in IGF1R-overexpressing (HEKI) cells. Scale bars represent 20 μm. ( B ) Relative levels of the cytosolic delivery efficiency of EGFP in HEKI cells compared with parental HEK293 cells (set to 100%). Merged images show EGFP fluorescence (green) and differential interference contrast. Statistical comparisons were performed against HEK293 cells using Student’s t -test. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). ** p < 0.01. N = 3.

    Article Snippet: Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 with 5 μg of the IGF1R CRISPR Activation Plasmid (sc-400084-ACT; Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

    Techniques: Over Expression, Fluorescence

    Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex stimulation on INSR/IGF1R in INSR-overexpressing cells. ( A ) IN#1 cells pretreated with DMSO (linsitinib [−]) or linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) were stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, or insulin for 2 min. Phosphorylation of INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R) was assessed by Western blot. ( B ) Relative levels of pINSR/pIGF1R were normalized to GAPDH, corresponding to the data in panel A. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed using Student’s t -test. Each treatment condition was compared with the solvent-treated IN#1 control (linsitinib [−]), and for each treatment, phosphorylation levels in the linsitinib (−) and linsitinib (+) conditions were also compared. Statistically significant differences compared with the solvent-treated control are indicated on the bar graphs, and significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. N = 3.

    Journal: Pharmaceuticals

    Article Title: Role of the Insulin Receptor in Mediating Cytosolic Delivery of Proteins by a Modified Cell-Penetrating Peptide

    doi: 10.3390/ph18121885

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Effects of Pas2r12 or Pas2r12–cargo protein complex stimulation on INSR/IGF1R in INSR-overexpressing cells. ( A ) IN#1 cells pretreated with DMSO (linsitinib [−]) or linsitinib (linsitinib [+]) were stimulated with Pas2r12, Pas2r12–EGFP, or insulin for 2 min. Phosphorylation of INSR/IGF1R (pINSR/pIGF1R) was assessed by Western blot. ( B ) Relative levels of pINSR/pIGF1R were normalized to GAPDH, corresponding to the data in panel A. Phosphorylation levels were analyzed using Student’s t -test. Each treatment condition was compared with the solvent-treated IN#1 control (linsitinib [−]), and for each treatment, phosphorylation levels in the linsitinib (−) and linsitinib (+) conditions were also compared. Statistically significant differences compared with the solvent-treated control are indicated on the bar graphs, and significant differences between linsitinib (+) and linsitinib (−) treatments are marked by horizontal lines. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. N = 3.

    Article Snippet: Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 with 5 μg of the IGF1R CRISPR Activation Plasmid (sc-400084-ACT; Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

    Techniques: Phospho-proteomics, Western Blot, Solvent, Control